Justin Rust

Friday, November 17, 2017

How successful are flowable composites over the long haul?

How well do flowable composites hold up for restorations of noncarious cervical lesions, and are there differences in performance? Researchers looked at long-term data and found that a newer material had better performance.


Read more on DrBicuspid.com


Related Reading:
Glass ionomer cement not ideal for wedge-shaped defects
Review: Reasons for composite failure have changed
Hybrid composite filler may delay caries
Review: GrandioSO regular or Heavy Flow equally effective
Failing composite restorations: Repair or replace?
Unknown at 2:56 AM
Share

No comments:

Post a Comment

‹
›
Home
View web version

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.